Showing posts with label Opinion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Opinion. Show all posts

Sunday, June 17, 2007

The way I see it

Well, time for a status report on the way I see things


Things have been hitting a few bumps here and there, as can be expected. After all, how many times has a candidate been drafted for President of the USA over the objection of the establishment, and over the internet? Precisely Zero. So we are breaking new ground here.

On the bright side, it looks as though our early activism (dating back to March here) has set the tide for Fred to declare a run for the presidency. He has garnered a lot of press, and has gotten a lot of net-support from all parts of the blogosphere.

On the not-so-bright side, there are the constant baseless attacks of the conspiracy loonies in the "Travis Bickle" contingent that back Ron Paul (and mindlessly attack anything that is not Ron Paul), the clueless inside-the-beltway people like the bloggers and columnists who regurgitate talking-head points - points we online folks have dealt with long ago online (see Fred Thompson FAQs for a shining example), and smear merchants and whispering campaigns from other campaigns - the ones Fred himself termed "gnats".

It is the price you pay when you become viable - people with entrenched interests are going to attack. And attack they have. The prior issues are really not all that important in the grand scheme of things, after all Ron Paul's lunacy is apparent to anyone that bothers to deeply research his past performance and positions, and his backing of the conspiracy cabal. And the other stuff? Its been dismissed by any reasonable observer after they have all the facts in hand - the truth is a great weapon to have on your side. The sad truth is: Half-truths, dis-ingenuousness and lies of omission have become standard operating procedure for politicians who have nothing to run for and therefore need something to run against. Which is why Fred's opponents have started in with such things.

It is to be expected, and with the net and all the supporters out there the speed of response is so fast that these disinformation campaigns are quashed for lack of credibility before they can gain any traction (as they say in the open source world "more eyes makes for shallow bugs").

Fred Thompson, given his power base in the Grass Roots and movement conservatives, does not need to seek the approval or permission of the insiders, nor will he need to kiss the ring (or any other part) of people like George Will and the other east-coast elites, who have set themselves up as faux kingmakers for the Republican party.

So, the big news for Prince George Will, Senator Foghorn Leghorn Lott, and your snooty elite Beltway and East Coast courtiers: your time is up.

You gave us George Bush 41 who then gave us Bill Clinton, and now George Bush 43.

Bush 43 gave us the largest entitlement program ever (Medicare prescription drug program), the No Child Left Behind act, a medal of freedom for that boob George Tenet (who should have been fired, not decorated), an untamed and undisciplined CIA that is at war with the executive branch (Scooter Libby), an incompetent Attorney General who has been so busy being a political errand boy (cleaning out prosecutors) that he has left important judicial nominations EMPTY for years. A President that started a war and then refused to defend it or appoint someone capable of articulating it well - and then he has mismanaged it completely with his misplaced penchant for loyalty over competence (Rumsfeld's resignation was ill timed and far too late). Bush also attempted to foist Harriet Myers on us, and even now is trying to jam a disastrous improperly formed and wrong-headed bill on immigration amnesty down our throats -- all whilst insulting us and impugning our motives.

You've had your run and it has ended in the Congressional and state electoral disasters of 2006 and the maelstrom of incompetence & pigheadedness which the Bush administration has become, all while it is circling the drain in effectiveness and public opinion.

Well guess what Kingmakers: We are coming to kick you out. Start packing - because we are going to do the one thing you fear most: we are going to do our best to make you irrelevant, just like the internet is hammering print news (As the NYT and other papers about circulation numbers). Your money and "rep" might be able to buy congressmen, but it cannot buy the most important thing: our votes. And without those, you lose. Never forget that - 2006 should have been your lesson. This candidacy and the immigration bill are your chance to show that you have learned.

But no matter what, this time, we the people are not going to vote for your handpicked "Next guy in line" candidate, bought and sold by the old Country Club and Rockefeller Repubs. No thanks to your presenting to us a Scylla and Charybdis; We will instead vote for someone that came from the Sam's Club Repubs side of things, someone we choose: A conservative who truly believes our causes at his core, a federalist who is well spoken and can deliver the message of small government that works better, and strong on defense and the war on terror: Fred Thompson.

Whether you come along or not, this train is leaving the station in a few weeks. Its your choice to be on it or under it.

For those of you on the Thompson Chattanooga Choo-Choo already - get ready, its going to be one wild ride. Be ready - soon we will need to stand.

Read More...

Sunday, May 27, 2007

Memorial Day


Rest in peace all my brothers in arms who gave up "that last full measure of devotion" (Lincoln). And God bless, save and hold all those in service to our nation, and the cause of liberty, for which it stands.


Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.

(Jn 15:13)


Never forget the cost and those who paid it. Respect them and defend what they gained for us.


Read More...

Monday, May 21, 2007

CALL THE CONGRESS NOW!


BUMPED FROM LAST WEEK: Get rid of this terrible bill in the Senate, the so-called Immigration "Reform" bill (its Amnesty plain and simple - Congress is lying to us). It is loaded with entitlements that will blast many government agencies and social services, poorly written with huge loopholes in it, and it does not properly provide for enforcement and border security FIRST. Its nothing more than the latest in a chain of broken promises from Congress. We need some sort of path to citizenship for some of these folks, but this bill giving a blanket amnesty is not the right one - we need security first or all this other legislation is meaningless. Call your congressional representatives and senators - and if you are a Republican also call Senator Kyl (of AZ), who negotiated this, and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (of KY) who rolled over for this. Here is Fred Thompson (read the previous blog entry on this for a full commentary). As usual, Fred is RIGHT!

Former Senator Fred D. Thompson today released the following statement regarding the immigration bill currently pending in the United States Senate:

With this bill, the American people are going to think they are being sold the same bill of goods as before on border security. We should scrap this bill and the whole debate until we can convince the American people that we have secured the borders or at least have made great headway.

Courtesy of Rich Lowery of National Review

Be sure to go to Numbers USA and send faxes NOW! Especially if you are, like I am, an American Legion member - the AL has come out squarely against this legislation. And call the RNC, RNCC, NRSC and remind them that you will never send money to an organization that betrays and sells out like they have. This is one of the most monumentally stupid moves the Republicans in the Senate have ever made, and for President George Bush's stupid moves, it even tops the Harriet Myers nomination. Operation Foot-Bullet in the Bush White House continues apace.

Read More...

State News: John Andrews Testifies on Immigration

Bumped from last week - in case you missed it, please read it all at Backbone America. On May 17, in Congress, former State Senate President John Andrews testified on the illegal immigration issues and the utter failure of the Federal Government to secure the border - and their severe and continuing impact on Colorado's citizens. Remarkably, his testimony calls for the same solution that Fred Thompson calls for: secure the border first and foremost. Only after that is accomplished is it proper to talk about amnesty.

Mme. Chairman and committee, Colorado is close to the front line of America’s unsecured southern border. We are a conduit for massive illegal traffic into this country. I dealt with the consequences as Senate President, 2003-2005. I bring you an appeal from our state to build the fence and secure the border first and foremost. I urge you not to reward lawbreakers with green cards and citizenship.

People in my state are self-reliant in their way of life, optimistic in their outlook, and welcoming to newcomers from anywhere in the world. We are not complainers, and we are not alarmists.

But we know a problem when we see one, and we expect a bargain to be kept. Right now millions of Coloradans see the invasion of illegal aliens as an urgent problem for our state, and we attribute that problem to the federal government’s failure to keep its bargain with Americans everywhere for secure borders and the rule of law.

[The Rest of the Story]

Amnesty for illegal aliens was supposed to fix this problem 20 years ago. It did not. Estimates today put the illegal alien population of Colorado at somewhere between 250,000 to 750,000 people – as much as 15 percent of the entire population.

Our schools, our health care system, and our criminal justice system are groaning under this burden. Our common culture and common language are fraying. We feel that Washington has let us down. It seems Congress and the White House just don’t care.

...

One of my son’s fellow officers, Donald Young, was brutally murdered by an illegal alien two years ago this month. My son has a T-shirt that says “Never Forget.” Coloradans have not forgotten, but we can’t solve this problem without your help in Congress.

The help we need is for you to build the fence and secure the border, period. No amnesty for lawbreakers. No so-called comprehensive solution for cheap votes and cheap labor. Just stop the invasion.

Courtesy of John Andrews at his blog Backbone America (.net)

Go and read it all - some very revealing statistics and issues there, ones that likely apply to all our states with illegals. Bravo John, Well said!

Read More...

Sunday, April 29, 2007

Contact Republicans in the State Assembly (AoTD 4/18-29)

Bumped daily as Article Of The Day. There are rumors and reports of moves afoot by the party insiders in Denver to grab the state legislature's leadership backing for Giuliani or Romney before the session lets out. We need to put a stop to that. Act Now.

Call the Republican Leadership and let them know: STOP! Wait until all the racers are on the track - and wait until Fred Thompson declares. Especially: No Guiliani!

First -call the leadership (below the fold). Then Check and see if your local representative and senator are republicans - if they are be sure to call them. Try looking at the Colorado State Legislature site. When you call, be sure to offer your name, where you are from (in general the city or county is enough, explain why you are calling and ask them if they'd like your phone number. Remember to thank them for passing your message along to the Senator or Representative. Polite and calm wins the day.

For the names and phone numbers for the Colorado Legislative Republican Leadership, Hit READ MORE. There are also some talking points if you need them and a sample call.

[The Rest of the Story]


Points to make on the call: (USE YOUR OWN WORDS - these are just an example)

* There are reports and rumors that the state party people and power brokers are pushing legislators to back one of two factions: Guiliani or Romney.

* I believe this is a wrong move for Republicans in Colorado.

* Rudy Guiliani presents far too many problems for Republicans in Colorado

* Wrong side of the abortion question for most Republicans, in favor of federal funding for abortions

* Giuliani is wrong on guns, and generally wrong for Colorado.

* Romney is a spin artist, not a genuine conservative - look at his "lifelong hunter" baloney.

* It is a mistake splitting the party

* It is a mistake to endorse any candidate that does not genuinely support ALL of the conservative common sense values like the 2nd Amendment, Pro Life, and Small Government.

* (optionally) Fred Thompson is a better choice as he will appeal to both conservative and independents.


And this is a VERY important one to raise with Republican Party HQ:


How can you square Mayor Guiliani's liberal positions on social issues with those of Bob Schaeffer, who is likely going to be our Senate candidate? We cannot have a party running against itself.

If they have questions about your positions, simply talk to them about your concerns - do not read froma script, be genuine. If there are questions about Fred Thompson that you do not know, point them to Draft Fred Thompson and The Committee to Draft Fred Thompson. Or alternately to this web site.

Its especially important to call these guys - we need as many as we can get - so start NOW! A CALL is more effective than an email.

Whatever you do, be sure to call as many of the party leadership listed below as you can in addition to your local Republican rep and senator (if you are fortunate enough to have one). Be sure to also call all your friends and get them to call these legislators as well.


People to talk to:


At a MINIMUM - call the House Leader Mike May and Senate Leader Andrew McElhany, and the State GOP Headquarters, the first 3 listed below:


House Minority Leader
May, Mike
District 44 Douglas
Cap: 303-866-5523
E-mail: mike.may.house@state.co.us

Senate Minority Leader
McElhany, Andrew
SDist 12 El Paso County
Cap: 303-866-2318
No Email

Colorado Republicans (The State party)
1777 S. Harrison Street, Ste. 100
Denver, CO. 80210
Phone: 303-758-3333
Fax: 303-753-4611


And if you have the time, call these as well.


House Assistant Minority Leader
Balmer, David G
Dist 39 Arapahoe
Cap: 303-866-2935
E-mail: david.balmer.house@state.co.us

House Minority Caucus Chair
Cadman, Bill
HDist 15 El Paso County
Cap: 303-866-5525
E-mail: bill.cadman.house@state.co.us

Senate Assistant Minority Leader
Spence, Nancy
SDist 27 Arapahoe County
Cap: 303-866-4883
E-mail: nancyspence@qwest.net

Senate Minority Caucus Leader
May, Ron
SDist 10 El Paso County
Cap: 303-866-2737
E-mail: senatormay@ronmay.org


Here is a sample call:


Hello, My name is Ordinary Coloradan, and I'm calling from Arapahoe County. I'd like to leave a message for Representative Mays regarding a rumor going around. I heard that the legislative and party leadership are pushing legislators to endorsing Mitt Romney or Rudy Giuliani, depending on faction. I believe this is a wrong move for Republicans in Colorado. Mitt Romney is not credible nor authentic in his stands on the important issues - he is a hip deep in spin and drilling deeper. Rudy Guiliani causes too many problems for Republicans in Colorado. He is on the wrong side of the abortion question for most Republicans, he is in favor of federal funding, he has been repeatedly wrong on guns, and is generally wrong for Colorado. Don't make the mistake of splitting the party by abandoning conservatives. [if they seem receptive: Give Fred Thompson a look first - he is the one Republican capable of building consensus and uniting conservatives and independents. He is the kind of candidate we need to win in Colorado.]
Thanks for letting Representative Mays know what we grass roots Republicans are thinking out here! Would you like my phone number so you can call me if you have any questions? Its 303-555-1212. Again, thanks for your time, and please let Representative Mays know we are concerned, and thanks for holding the line against the Democrat majority. Have a good day - Bye! [if you talked about Fred before then you could add something like this in: I believe Senator Thompson will be the better candidate and he deserves more consideration before anyone decides anything.]


Let them know - NO Guiliani! He's too liberal for Colorado. Endorse Fred Thompson - or at least don't endorse anyone until Fred declares! You do not want to jump too soon - wait until the big guy jumps in!


If you have time, these are good points to make too:

* Did you know that Fred Thompson won the straw poll in Oklahoma last week with more than triple the votes of Guiliani?

* Did you know that Missouri Speaker, Lt Gov and state legislators overwhelmingly have backed him in a petition just 2 weeks ago?

* Did you know that Fred Thompson outpolls the other Republicans nationally except Guiliani?

* Did you know he has done all this prior to starting his own campaign?


If they want to talk about Fred Thompson:


Fred Thompson is polling well nationally, and has political stands on things that will appeal to a broad swath of Colorado voters. And what's more important is that he is a consensus builder and a uniter, not a polarizing figure, and he is rated positively by conservatives and independents alike.


Read More...

Saturday, April 21, 2007

Why on earth are they still on their horses?

Very pithy print-media editorial from Indiana district whose Congressional representative endorsed FDT(Rep Buyer). Small Town America at its best. This is Fred's base,, which Giuliani McCain and Romney will never reach. Read below the fold for some chuckle-worthy chops on "the leading three" - for example: The "leading" contenders for the GOP presidential nomination have the excitement factor of a dippin' cup. HAH!

The Republican Party may have just received the answer to their Hillary Clinton problem — Fred Thompson. Wednesday, he met with 53 House Republicans, including Indiana’s Rep. Steve Buyer, who asked him to consider a presidential run.

[The Rest of the Story]

Buyer said one of Thompson’s attractions is “throughout his career, being President was not his paramount focus.”

In the 1980 TV miniseries, “Shogun,” based on the novel by James Clavell, the main character constantly insisted he had no desire to drawn into the intricate political intrigues that would lead him to the title “shogun,” or master, of feudal Japan. Of course, the series ended with the character saying, in a voice-over, “my destiny is to be Shogun.”

Thompson may not be pulling a shogun, but his timing is — intricate.

The “leading” contenders for the GOP presidential nomination have the excitement factor of a dippin’ cup. Arizona Sen. John McCain maintained his loyalty to the president’s war effort a bit too long. He scorched any credibility of being a pragmatic realist after his infamous tour of a Baghdad market, escorted by several platoons of heavily-armed infantry and two Cobra gunships, then declaring he felt just as safe as a newborn cradled in mommy’s arms.

Rudy Guiliani, former mayor of New York City, has to overcome being the former mayor of New York City, even though he performed heroically as a rallying point after September 11. He blew any chance of winning over the party’s “morals and family values” wing after his second divorce.

Mitt Romney? He’s a former Republican governor from Massachusetts — the political Fates have already given him all the slack he’s entitled to. Besides, on the issues Romney is hip-deep in spin and drilling deeper every day.

For them, it’s less “who are these guys” than it is “why on earth are they still on their horses?”

Courtesy of By Rod Rose of The Lebanon Reporter (Lebanon, Ind.) in the Meadville Tribune

Love that line: "Romney is hip-deep in spin and drilling deeper every day." - That is going in my mental quote file! As usual, read the whole thing - there's more at the link


Read More...

Friday, April 13, 2007

Fred Thompson, Man Alone

Authenticity. Some dont have it - but Fred has it aplenty as shown in actions that speak volumes. All the other candidates have an entourage - their sycophants, advisers, their people who play "Bundini Brown" hanger-on to the "Muhammad Ali" of the candidate. But not Fred Thompson. He came in alone. No wonks or advisers needed. This is very impressive and indicative of the character and strength Fred Thompson will bring to the Presidency.

One final footnote on Fred Thompson. It's a little thing, but it struck me and my executive producer Gary Schreier as we greeted him this week: He came alone.

Alone — no handlers, no enablers, no key people, no any people.

Just Fred, by himself.

Nope. No briefcase guy. Or cell phone dude. No policy wonk or statement checker. No people at all.

[The Rest of the Story]

And Gary and I are thinking, hey this guy is tracking sometimes second in GOP polls for president.

For president! Of the United States!!

And we're looking for his entourage, his hangers-on, you know, the guy who holds his briefcase.

Another, his cell phone, still another his coat.

Someone who polices his words, advises him on statements to the press.

Nope. No briefcase guy. Or cell phone dude. No policy wonk or statement checker.

No people at all.

Get this: I had more people than he had people.

Which tells you something about Fred, I guess: The image things that seem to matter to others don't much matter to Fred.

Surely, I'm thinking to myself, this will all change if he runs for president. Even the loserest of candidates has loser lemmings. Lots of them!

But I wonder: Maybe Fred would be the guy who puts less stock in handlers and more in himself.

He'd be different, that's for sure. His people weren't saying that — Fred was. Before he shook my hand after our interview and walked out of this building... alone.

Courtesy of Neal Cavuto, Fox News

This is what is winning Fred so many people across the spectrum - what you see is what you get, and he does not need advisory boards to tell him what his opinion is. Authenticity, genuineness, strong core beliefs. And its something that no amount of campaign moneycan buy.

Read More...

My Opinion on the state of the State GOP (a view from the bottom)

Is this my Howard Beale moment regarding the Colorado GOP leadership? Or is it, as I figure, just spitting in wind?

I will say this - I'm not the only GOP volunteer and donor from 2006 that feels this way. If the top of the GOP think they can keep getting us to donate money and volunteer time - and they keep coming back with inauthentic insincere slick rich guys like Mitt Romney, or accidental Republicans like Rudy Giuliani, or worn out old mavericks like John McCain, they are sadly mistaken. We've had enough. We want something else - we're mad as hell and we're not going to take it anymore.


[The Rest of the Story]

It already happened to a large degree in the 06 races - thats why Bob Beauprez got wiped and Bill Owens hand picked candidate O'Donnell got stomped in whats nominally a Republican congressional district, one that Beauprez won handily in 04 and would he have held in 06 had he stayed put and let Coffman run for the Gov's seat.

Guys, you've stopped listening to us regular guys in the party, so now we are going to stop listening to you - and if you get in our way or are too scared or ignorant to change course even with this prodding, then you can forget about the party going on as a viable political force in anything other than a small minority role for a long time.

You're losing the base - the grass roots and the foot soldiers, precinct walkers, phone bank people, envelope stuffers. And you haven't adapted to the multi-week vote cycle, the weeks of early voting, mail in, and other changes. These are changes that render the old direct mail surge and "Final Four" methods (that worked in 2000 and 2004) ineffective now.

You aren't getting out here in the internet and keeping a presence in place, keeping a drumbeat - you're going silent instead (look at your dated and poorly designed websites!). You aren't raising fund out here on the net - you aren't bankrolling the operations of opinion shapers like the left is with HuffPo and Kos - people that keep their base active and motivated during the off season.

And you don't even seem to realize that you're losing it.

For God's Sake! Wake up before its too late.

Courtesy of Ordinary Coloradan

Am I Howard Beale? Nah, I'm too tired for that. I figure I'm just spitting into the wind, too damn worn out and discouraged to do anything else. But I still care enough to raise a fuss. Whats worrisome is others are so tired they've given up even doing that. And will be the dirge of the GOP in Colorado "I don't care anymore".

Read More...

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Colorado For Thompson Editorial - Fred vs the RNC & Sellout Pundits

These are my thoughts, and my opinion alone. Subject to change, but its whats on my mind now after I read the Article of the Day for 4/11


Referring to the Article of the Day for 4/11, "Inspiring the American Voter", I especially love the part about the RNC being more afraid of him (Fred) than the DNC. If we at the grass roots keep pushing, we can get Fred nominated on his own terms - and elected without any of the "Country Club Repub" people having in hooks in him. He will not be beholden to ANYONE - and thats why he will win. How do we do it, and what do we look out for?



[The Rest of the Story]


You know what? We the people do have a voice here on the net that cannot be bought unlike some pundits. Hugh Hewitt for example, has practically prostituted himself for Romney, even stooping to post thinly masked partisan attack pieces on Fred Thompson on his blog. Hugh is jumping the shark. But that doesn't mean he can be ignored - just overcome with relentless pressure about the facts on his candidate's inadequacies and Fred's strengths in comparison.

Be ready - as you can see from Hugh Hewitt's actions, the country club set are not going to go down easy, and they have money to buy off a lot of folks.

Except for Rush Limbaugh probably. Nobody owns Rush but Rush.

Bottom line: It is up to us to translate this activity on the internet into action off the net in the real world. We should tell our neighbors, friends, relatives, and so on, about Fred Thompson, his story, his stances, and his credibility. So when he jumps in, so do we in terms of a campaign.

Start reaching and teaching now. Even if its just a casual mention, and point them at this or any of the other fine websites for Fred Thompson 2008. And ask them if they like what they see. If they do, then have them tell anyone else they think might be interested. I have been amazed at the responses I have gotten at my work, in conservative groups, with conservative friends, and in my parish. The time to start sowing the seeds of victory is now.


Courtesy of Colorado For Thompson


Read More...

Friday, April 6, 2007

A Man Named Fred

A well balance and thoughtful appraisal of the Fred Thompson candidacy. And some insight into the chracter of Fred Thompson (note the circumstance she details - he's not feeling well but meets his committments)


Fred Dalton Thompson is a towering figure.

I've seen him in real life; just outside the ABC broadcast facilities in Washington, D.C., where he exited after taping a broadcast for Paul Harvey's "News and Comment." I nearly sprained my neck looking up and trying to take in his 6-foot 6-inch frame.

He didn't look well that day. At dinner the previous evening, Thompson had contracted food poisoning. The D.C. bureau chief told me that despite his obvious discomfort, he had nonetheless posted his segment. In my business, that counts for a lot. Deadlines are everything.



[The Rest of the Story]


I don't agree with every single vote Fred Thompson has offered during his service as a United States senator (more on that later). But after serving honorably, he retreated to private life, started a second family and regenerated from the body politic. SCORE! That's a lot more than you can say about so many professional politicians who inhabit Washington these days. Thomas Jefferson would have applauded Thompson's decision.

For me, there are two essential issues facing this nation that absolutely require principled conservative leadership... The first is the war on terrorism.... the second issue of import is securing our borders...

Thompson offers great promise to conservatives on both of these issues. Thompson hasn't had to do a 180-degree change on his policy positions to become conservative on the war on terrorism and immigration.

On immigration, Fred Thompson has shown that he "gets" the problem and isn't afraid to offend the sensibilities of the pro-amnesty and cheap labor crowd. You can hear Fred Thompson's views on illegal immigration online.

On the war on terrorism, Thompson has been both an advocate for our troops, a staunch supporter of the policies in Iraq and Afghanistan and has displayed his willingness to tackle the radical factions of Islam who are at war with the United States and Western civilization.


Courtesy of Melanie Morgan at Worldnet Daily


A quick look around here should give any of her doubts a rest - especially if she looks up the Fox News transcripts on the Campaign Finance Reform. At the link, the article has great audio clips embedded in it - and you have them here (look in the sidebar at the top "Quotes and Quips"). FYI the author was one of the organizers of the Eagl Day that supported veterans who countered the anti-war protests at the Vietnam Veterans memorial in March.


Read More...

NRA backing Fred Thompson?

Interesting Observation about how the NRA may have a candidate it can back without reservations/doubts


One powerful organization that may breathe easier at news of a Thompson bid is the National Rifle Association. Each of the “big three” Republican presidential frontrunners has a glaring flaw in the eyes of the organization, although the group has not sought to emphasize its disagreements with the trio.

As governor, Mr. Romney pledged to continue his state’s “tough gun laws,” which he praised for providing public safety. As a candidate for Senate in 1994, Mr. Romney supported the Brady bill, which imposes a five-day waiting period on gun sales and a ban on certain assault weapons. And as a gubernatorial candidate in 2002, Mr. Romney received a “B” grade from the organization. He only joined the NRA last year, and as of January, he did not own a gun.

Not to mention his dissembling about being a hunter "all his life" when he went once when he was 15 and once at a fundraiser and thats it.



[The Rest of the Story]


For much of Senator McCain’s career, he accumulated a pro-gun record, but the Arizona lawmaker twice co-sponsored legislation that would regulate gun shows more strictly, which the NRA opposed.

Mayor Giuliani faces the difficult task of overcoming a career-long position favoring various gun control laws. In an early campaign appearance with the radio talk show host Sean Hannity, Mr. Giuliani indicated that he would not support New York City’s gun laws on a national scale: “Yes, I mean, a place like New York that is densely populated or maybe a place that is experiencing a serious crime problem … maybe you have one solution there and in another place, more rural, more suburban, other issues, you have a different set of rules.”

But to the NRA, Mr. Giuliani’s stance means that the Second Amendment can be violated, so long as it is only on the local level — an unacceptable compromise.

By comparison, Mr. Thompson’s relationship with gun-rights groups is sterling. A 2000 report from a campaign-finance watchdog group, Common Cause, found that the NRA, Gun Owners of America, and the Georgia Gun Owners PAC donated $188,954 to Mr. Thompson between 1993 and 1999; the groups donated more only to Dr. Frist. (Mr. Thompson was elected in a special election in 1994.)


Courtesy of Carry On America blog


Read More...

Thursday, April 5, 2007

Fred Thompson on "Real American Idols"

Again, Fred THompson in his own words...


If you tune into the news, you’re going to end up hearing or reading at least the headlines of stories you’d probably rather not know about. Somehow, I know that Paris Hilton may have violated her parole. I’m not sure how it happened, but I even know a little about Britney Spears’s hairdo, divorce, and trip to rehab. These bits of cultural trivia, I really wish I hadn’t digested.

What I’m not going to do now is scold editors for spending more time on Anna Nicole Smith and Lindsay Lohan than the details of our federal budget. To begin with, it would have about as much impact as it would for me to tell some pop starlet, who has more money than I ever will, to put on some decent clothes and behave herself.



[The Rest of the Story]


I do think, though, that we should be worried when our children are shown over and over again that people who are rich and famous, and are presented as “idols,” get even more rich and famous due to behaviors that would be rightly deemed tragedies in most families. So, instead of telling our news sources what not to publish, maybe I could make a few suggestions for additional programming.

There are young women who are succeeding because of all the old virtues that we want our children to learn and emulate — women whose stories are just as compelling and entertaining as Britney Spears’s. One is Candace Parker, the 20-year-old forward for the University of Tennessee’s Lady Volunteers — who just won the NCAA women’s basketball championship...


The best part of this is at the link, go read it


Courtesy of Fred Thompson on the National Review


Read More...

Tuesday, April 3, 2007

Anyone can run - will Fred thompson run?

Rather a slow Fred Thompson news day - most of the "news" was simply a rehash or repeat of things I have posted here. I guess that's the nature of getting out in front of things, whats old to you is new to others. But this is new - and its a decent opinion piece by someone who knows Fred Thompson well. As usual theres much more to this than I post here.


Unhappiness with the field turned Fred Thompson's appearance on ``Fox News Sunday'' on March 11 into ``the shot heard round the conservative world,'' according to Scott Reed, Bob Dole's former presidential campaign manager. Two weeks after that appearance, when Thompson said he was ``giving some thought'' to a run, he sprinted ahead of Romney, who has been running for a year.



[The Rest of the Story]


Fred Thompson could get in late and catch up fast. Out of public office for four years but not out of the public eye as the gruff and domineering prosecutor on ``Law & Order,'' he began his political career as the young counsel to Senator Howard Baker during the Watergate hearings.

He was elected twice to the Senate, but is drawing attention as much for playing Washington authority figures in the movies like the rear admiral in ``Hunt for Red October'' as for being one. He's an intellectual Reagan.


Courtesy of Margaret Carlson on Bloomberg.com


Read More...

Monday, April 2, 2007

Washington Post (Novak): "Thompson Is for Real"

Robert Novak goes through the reasons Fred Thompson would run - and why he would be a powerful candidate when he chooses to do so. There is also a mention of not wanting to do "like Obama" and enter too soon which would waste momentum


In just three weeks, Fred Thompson has transformed the contest for the Republican presidential nomination. It is not merely that he has come from nowhere to double digits in polls. He is the talk of GOP political circles because he is filling the conservative void in the field.



[The Rest of the Story]


Thompson was surprised by the reaction to his statement that he was "giving some thought" to running. In the first Gallup Poll that listed Thompson (conducted March 23-25), he scored 12 percent -- amazing for someone out of public life for more than four years who has not campaigned. More important is his backing within the political community. Buyer's remorse is expressed by several House members who endorsed Romney, the former Massachusetts governor.

The principal complaint about Thompson concerns not his ideology but his work ethic. The rap is that he does not burn the midnight oil -- the identical criticism of Reagan. That carping may betray resentment that Thompson has emerged as a full-blown contender without backbreaking campaign travel and tedious fundraising.


Courtesy of Robert Novak in the Washington Post


As usual, the entire article at the link amplifies and fills in much that is omitted here.


Read More...

Sunday, April 1, 2007

If Repubs want star power, street smarts and likeability...

More reasons for Fred Thompson to run.


If Republicans want star power, street smarts and likeability rolled into one, they could do a good deal worse than the former Tennessee Senator Fred Thompson. There are several decent, tough and honorable men running for President on the Republican side. John McCain is a hero. Rudolph Giuliani has a likeability and pragmatism that would serve him well as president. Newt Gingrich, should he decide to run, would bring significant intellectual firepower to the arena.

But if Republicans want star power, street smarts and likeability rolled into one (and since Powell is not running), they could do a good deal worse than the former Tennessee Senator Fred Thompson.



[The Rest of the Story]


Thompson, it is now known, is considering entering the race. He should do so and do it quickly. He is clearly the candidate Democrats most fear. He is an articulate (whoops) conservative who also is quick on his feet and brings the gravitas and tough-mindedness that we need in the presidency.

He is used to the give and take of Washington politics, knowledge which would make him more effective than President Bush in managing the Democratic attack machine. He has also thrived as a conservative in a Hollywood culture that can be unforgiving toward anyone to the right of Bill Clinton.

These are all good reasons for Thompson to consider running. But there is one overriding reason. His nation needs him.


Courtesy of George Shadroui on the Intellectual Conservative blog


More good reasons at the link - go visit.


Read More...

Fred Thompson to the Rescue

I disagree with many of Mark Shield's characterizations in the liked piece, especially the GOP, conservatism and the Iraq war. But his commentary from that side of things is interesting in that he finds Fred Thompson to be a strong and credible candidate.


Let me be clear. I like former U.S. senator (1994-2003) and current professional actor Fred Thompson, R-Tenn. A loyal conservative, he wore no man's collar in public office, took on corrupt political fund-raising where he found it and was one of only four U.S. senators who endorsed John McCain for president in 2000.



[The Rest of the Story]


The fact that one of the more estimable public servants of the last four decades, former Thompson mentor and Senate Republican leader Howard Baker, is backing him is a major reference. Almost as important a recommendation was the questioning of Thompson's religious orthodoxy by arbitrary arbiter and political boss Dr. James Dobson: "I don't think he's a Christian."


Republican voters are looking to be "rescued." They know that an unpopular president, George W. Bush, who took the country into an unpopular and disastrous war of occupation of Iraq, is the face of the Republican Party.


Courtesy of Mark Shields in his online opinion column


There is far more to his article than the small fair use excerpt I have here. Some of it disagreeable, but all of it interesting.


Read More...

Saturday, March 31, 2007

Too Late for Fred Thompson? (AoTD 3/31)

Not really. The article below details the case for late entries - especially Fred Thompson givenhis impact on the polls. The similar things might apply to Gilmore of VA and maybe Newt (that is, if Gingrich wasn't carrying enough baggage to fill a Fedex Cargo Jet)


Last week I wrote of the amazing draft Fred Thompson movement. And this week, I saw an interesting thing happen. As dubiously as I normally regard polling data, the latest from Rasmussen--its first national telephone survey involving Thompson --may be highly instructive. The results show that without even the brim of his hat in the ring, he already leads Hillary Clinton by a percentage point.



[The Rest of the Story]


There are those who say that it's too late for Fred; that it takes an enormous amount of time to build up name recognition. These people obviously never sit around, as do I, enjoying adult beverages with regular folks who can effortlessly identify everyone, from last night's contestants on American Idol to the latest missing mountaineer by name.

Some also contend that he's way behind in endorsements and fundraising. But scuttlebutt has it that nearly one quarter of House Republicans may be ready to back him when he visits Capitol Hill on April 18th. And money from grassroots conservatives and the rest of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy could pile up quickly should they feel they have one of their own in the fight.

And so, following Vito Corleone's advice to his son regarding enemies, let's listen to what our close friends at the Daily Kos think of Thompson:

[H]e's popular with the Republican base and has proven electoral appeal with swing voters and independents... he's very intelligent, a strong speaker and an excellent debater...Moreover, he would have several strengths against any of our top three candidates. He comes off to most as more likable than Hillary Clinton. Unlike McCain, Giuliani or Romney, he'll certainly out-Southern John Edwards. And he'll score well on the gravitas score against either Edwards or Obama (less so for the latter).

Let's hope he doesn't run, or that if he does, all the top money and operatives have already been snatched up and he gains no more traction than, say, Mike Huckabee.


Courtesy of Lisa Fabrizio on GOPUSA.com


Comments are open closed for this article - be sure to hit the link and read the whole article.


Read More...

Thursday, March 29, 2007

Thompson/Romney 08? A good case for that ticket now!

A very intriguing case for a Thompson/Romney ticket - not next year, but NOW! A very very good read.

On radio and TV, Senator Thompson has presence developed over a lifetime in front of critical audiences as a lawyer, politician and actor. He projects centered self-confidence. His skills as a communicator will win him a substantial following, perhaps substantial enough to take the Republican Party by storm.

Fred Thompson's principal political liability is that he has never run anything. This is hardly disqualifying for a president, but it may be disabling for a presidential candidate getting off to a late start.

If one has to choose between a skilled administrator and a skilled communicator in a presidential primary, take the communicator every time. The presidency is essentially about the vision thing - both having it and selling it. A president with vision can hire all the administrative talent he needs. No president without it has ever been able to manage his way to a successful presidency. Just dust off your ouija board and ask the ghost of Herbert Hoover the way Hillary consults Eleanor Roosevelt.

[The Rest of the Story]

There is every reason to believe that Fred Thompson has the skills to be an excellent president, but does he have the skills to put together an effective campaign in less than half the time all his competitors have devoted to the same task? Color me skeptical.

The office of Vice President has steadily increased in importance and it seems odd to treat it as such an afterthought. Why go through the entire nominating process and then pull a running mate out of a hat at the convention? Why not form a team of running mates early in the process so two politicians can pool their resources the better to rally their party?

You (Romney) are in a unique position to do this. Get Fred on the horn and offer an alliance. Offer to run for Vice President as his running mate. A Thompson-Romney team would probably sweep all the competition for the Republican nomination aside.

Senator Thompson, who is sixty-four years old, might very well have no interest in serving more than one term as President, which would make this arrangement particularly advantageous for you. Even if he served two terms you would get your shot in 2016 when you will still be younger than John McCain is today. In the mean time you'll be gainfully employed and both the Republican Party and the nation will have a chance to grow comfortable with you.

You can offer Thompson campaign funds, an established national organization, and an able partner with executive experience and no trace of a southern accent. He can offer you a golden opportunity to convince Republicans that the Mitt Romney they meet on the campaign trail this year is the real Romney. He can help you make the difficult transition from Massachusetts politics to the national stage. With respect Governor, it isn't clear that you can make the transition any other way.


Comments are open! Be sure to click though and read the entire article - there is a lot more information and good argument there.

Courtesy of J. Peter Mulhern of American Thinker

Read More...

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Fred Thompson on the Conspiracy Crowd

Again, Fred Thompson is on target - this time its the Conspiracy Nuts

A lot of people have at least a little in common with (Charlie) Sheen and (Rosie) O’Donnell. They just don’t like to think about how much our enemies actually hate us. It’s easier to escape down a rabbit hole to a land where our own government is tricking us into thinking the world is a dangerous place.



GO LISTEN to it all - the small printed excerpt above does not do it justice, and it is also in my sidebar permanent "Quips and Quotes" section.

This would be the same government that can’t even keep our most secret surveillance programs out of the newspapers.

Courtesy of
National Review Online (text audio)

Read More...

Monday, March 26, 2007

Hunt for a Fred November

Clever pun on Fred Thompson's appearance as Adm Josh Painter in The Hunt For Red October (Funny, I know a good Army SSG named Josh Painter). Another columnist that backs Fred Dalton Thompson.

Republicans have been going through a process not uncommon in politics. They’ve been looking over the field in the race and wondering if there isn’t a faster horse that has yet to enter.
If Thompson seeks the Republican nomination, he’ll win it, unless there is some as-yet-unknown oversized skeleton lurking in his political closet.

He’ll win for three reasons:

He’s a southerner with conservative credentials in national government service

He’s a personality in an age of personality-driven politics

He will out-presence his opponents

Courtesy of George Korda of the Knoxville News and Sentinel

Read More...


All copyrights remain those of the respective authors, including commenters. I am not responsible for what commenters write here. Excerpts of articles are under Fair Use Doctrine.

This site has no affiliation nor relationship with any organization, nor any affiliation or relationship to Fred Thompson, and is not authorized by any candidate nor by any candidate's committee.

In plain English: This is my site, and I'm not working on behalf of, at the direction on, bought by or beholden to anyone or anything other than my judgement and conscience. (c) 2007